Read all of Sunday.
The purpose of the World Economic Forum
You may have heard of the World Economic Forum (WEF). It bills itself as an event that brings together leaders in business and politics to discuss the world's most pressing issues, an elite think tank working for the common good...
They go on to say that the World Economic Forum brings together decision makers from across society to work on projects and initiatives that make a real difference. Statement: “Through collaboration between stakeholders with different perspectives, our projects deliver concrete and sustainable results and have a positive impact at all levels of society.
On the other hand, some see the World Economic Forum not as a force for good but as something far more sinister.
When you open the curtains, it's a different world. For a long time, the WEF was closely associated with the globalist agenda. Many of its members are high-ranking politicians and businesspeople who support neoliberalism and globalization.
As they claim, the World Economic Forum can be a prestigious annual event where global political and business leaders act for the common good. but whose common good is that, that is the question!
Most of the participants do not represent the people or the workers, but the oligarchy and its agents. When they come together to discuss the world's most pressing issues, they lose the way they discuss those issues to exploit them for their own agenda, power and profit.
It was The Great Reset that set the internet on fire when Professor Klaus Schwab, founder and CEO of the World Economic Forum, called Covid an opportunity. he suggested, "The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reinvent and redefine our world."
The truth is that the reconfiguration manifested itself in the fact that the oligarchies seized and exploited opportunities to steal governments and public funds, with billions disappearing and not even being pursued.
Of course, it's always a conspiracy when we talk about organizations like this.
And of course, keeping silent on these issues is exactly what they want, which is exactly why they claim it's all a conspiracy.
Regardless of the insults you receive for office, however, it should be clear that what is happening in Davos is having a profound impact on all of us, both economically and on the remnants of our democracy, and certainly not on us ordinary people. good.
As you can see, the main purpose of the World Economic Forum is to act as a flattering forum for the oligarchic mafiacracy of globalization. The agenda is an anti-democratic elitist position promoted by the political agents of the oligarchy. This agenda is an attack on the working class and effectively a road to serfdom. Globalists have little need for national allegiance and see national borders as obstacles. They see national governments only as useful functions to facilitate their global operations, legally protect their property, and legislate to manage the economic conditions under which they can function.
Far from being a form of internationalism and the end of nation-states, it is a globalization that governments will use to manage people and commodify each individual, valuing their productivity.
The World Economic Forum is where it all happens, where globalists and political activists come together to negotiate deals that further the oligarchic goals of globalization.
What is the agenda of the globalists?
The new globalists and the story behind.
In the late 1960s, George Ball became the main spokesman for a group of businessmen who were strong advocates of globalization. Like Ball, they, along with some of the political elite friends they refer to, have seen globalization falter.New York TimesAs the "new globalists", they decided to take a direct role in promoting globalization. Otherwise, they feared that the postwar order would falter.
Ball argued that global markets needed to be freed from "the perpetual interference of their messy parent, the sovereign state", and so the New Globalists worked to promote the sovereignty of markets as the basis of globalization. Klaus Schwab decided that the New Globalists needed formal platforms to promote their ideas and founded them.World Economic Forumand David Rockefeller created thetrilateral commission. These corporate organizations successfully co-opted members of the political elite and together formed an engine room for strategies, partnerships and programs to expand the frontiers of market-driven globalization.
Samuel Huntington, a highly respected political theorist, observes that this distant elite “has little need for national loyalty, sees national borders as obstacles, and sees national governments as remnants of the past whose only useful function is the elite's global operations to facilitate . " This internationalist agenda of capital is an elitist minority position, not a popularly supported internationalism. On the surface, the discussions were about pressing global issues, but in reality, the main purpose of the World Economic Forum is to act as a welcoming forum to the oligarchic mafia of globalization in the service of its own financial interests.
They see national governments only as useful functions to facilitate global operations.
the globalists Agenda is an elitist and anti-democratic position driven by the political agents of the oligarchy, parliamentarians and their public services who operate a revolving door in and out of politics, banks and boards.
Its purpose is to exert and exercise full control over the global markets.market forcesas an economic weapon wherever they feel leverage is needed for one reason or another.
If you're wondering who the oligarchy is, check out the Davos guest list. Look at the business we use every day, from the Big Six supermarkets to Amazon, Google and Microsoft, all of which make a profit but pay little or no tax in the countries they operate in. If you're still not sure, look at your energy bills and who your major shareholders are.
So what does Sir Keir Starmer have to do with all this and who is the Trilateral Commission?
Sir Keir Rodney StarmerKCBKCis a British politician and lawyer who has served as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Labor Party since 2020. He has been a Member of Parliament (MP) for Holborn and St Pancrass since 2015.Director of the Public Ministryfrom 2008 to 2013 and is now aMember of the Trilateral Commission.
Under Starmer, the Labor Party became a centre-right party, no longer advocating a democratic socialist agenda of internationalism and working-class emancipation. Instead, it offers a partnership between business and globalization that will lead workers down the path of serfdom. Where every facet of your life becomes a commodity. Where people are only valued for their ability to expand their assigned production area.
In particular, former BBC journalist Emily Maitlis' potential future prime minister told the conference that she preferred Davos to Westminster, saying that London's seat of power was "too constrained". "It's closed and we don't care... once you leave Westminster, whether it's Davos or elsewhere, you meet people you can work with in the future. Westminster is just a screaming tribal square," said the Labor leader.
Its preference for globalization is demonstrated by its commitment to society and business, while clearly alienating Labor from the workers and unions for which it was formed. His tweet from Davos reads:
The Labor Party will attract global investors to boost our economy. We will decarbonise the economy, create good jobs, increase energy security and make the UK a world leader in climate action. Brilliant to be in Davos@RachelReevesMPpresent our plan.
– Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer)January 19, 2023
The Labor Party will attract global investors to boost our economy.
We will decarbonise the economy, create good jobs, increase energy security and make the UK a world leader in climate action.
Brilliant to be in Davos@RachelReevesMPpresent our plan.pic.twitter.com/ufzjd1lWuV(Video) DAVOS LIVE: World Economic Forum session 'Is the World in a Debt Spiral?'
In contrast, the former Labor Party leader tweeted: "When billionaires gather on their mountain in Davos, 800 million people around the world go to bed hungry. It's time for a new economic model that redistributes wealth, ownership and power of those who own them. for those in need.
—Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn)January 19, 2023
When billionaires gather on their mountain in Davos, 800 million people around the world go to bed hungry.
It's time for a new economic model that redistributes wealth, property and power from those who have it to those who need it.
Beware of the Trilateral Commission.
Starmer is a member of the elite club of fellow globalists, the "Trilateral Commission", an organization that, like the WEF, promotes a globalist agenda. We have published many articles on this subject, but for these new readers, ultimately the Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockafella.
Both organizations emerged after a group of millionaires saw the decline of globalization in the late 1960s. George Ball became the main spokesman for this group of businessmen who were strong advocates of globalization. Ball, with some friends from the political elite, were expelled fromNew York Timeslike him"New Globalists"They decided that they should take a direct role in promoting globalization. Otherwise, they feared that the postwar order would falter.
Ball argued that there must be global markets.freed from "the incessant interference of its bewildered parent, the sovereign state",and so the New Globalists worked to promote itthe sovereignty of marketsas the basis of globalization.
Klaus Schwab decided that the New Globalists needed formal platforms to promote their ideas.World Economic Forumand David Rockefeller created thetrilateral commissionThese organizations successfully co-opted members of the political elite and together created an engine room for policies, partnerships and programs to expand the frontiers of market-driven globalization.
The Trilateral Commission has become an organization for leaders around the world.three economic superpowers: North America, Europe and Asia. Its aim is to promote free trade and global integration.
This might all sound like a noble idea until you dig a little deeper.
The commission aroused much controversy over its existence. Critics cite some commissioners' influence in politics and their connections to government agencies as reasons to question the commission's activities. Critics say this influence helps the Commission prop up the global financial and political elite, rather than representing the public's best interests.
Holly Sklar, in her book on trilateralism, says that the purpose of trilateralism is to protect the power of the international ruling class "whose locus of power is the global corporation"; co-opting the third world and reintegrating communist countries.
The commission's aim is to build a lasting partnership between the ruling classes of North America, Western Europe and Japan - hence the term "trilateral" - to safeguard the interests of Western capitalism in an explosive world.
Noam Chomsky says the Trilateral Commission's goal is to generate "moderation in democracy" so that only the elite can vote. No matter where your politics are, this is a step backwards for democracy and the labor movement for emancipation.
These are the elites who advocate a society of shareholders in which those with the greatest stake in society are, in their eyes, the ones who lose most in wealth, land and power, and therefore should be the only ones who should have a say in our society. This is a return to a feudal system controlled globally by the Trilateral Commission.
The crisis of democracy: on the governability of democracies.
Chomsky criticized the commission for explaining its objectives'undemocratic', with reference to its publication'The crisis of democracy,which describes a strong populist interest in politics in the 1970s as "democratic excess".
Simply put, the civil rights movement, trade unions in the UK and emerging democratic movements around the world have been a threat to globalisation, business and oligarchy. As we see today...
The crisis of democracy is that there is too much democracy!
The Trilateral Commission published only one major report book, The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governance of Democracies (Michel Crozier, Samuel Huntington, and Joji Watanuki, 1975). The commission's report deals with the "governance of democracies".
This report is on the Trilateral Commission's website as its only manifesto, a report that says in a nutshell that the world's problem is too much democracy.
The report makes the case for what is needed in industrial democracies"is a greater degree of moderation in democracy"to overcome"Democratic Excess"of the last decade. "The effective functioning of a democratic political system usually requires a degree of apathy and lack of participation on the part of some individuals and groups."
Chomsky described it as one of the most interesting and insightful books, showing that the modern democratic system does not claim to be a democracy, but a system of control by elites and the oligarchy.
Monitoring the political state of the United States, Europe and Japan, the report says that government problems in the United States "arise from an excess of democracy" and therefore advocates "restoring the position and authority of central government institutions". The report serves as an important point of reference for studies that address the current crisis of democracies.
The commission claimed that trade unions fighting for workers' rights, left-wing conferences at universities and colleges, and civil rights activists were blocking the flow of trade, thus hampering its globalist agenda.
Sir Keir Starmer's views on democracy are in line with those of his Trilateral Commission colleagues. This is a world away from his original promises of grassroots democracy and the manifesto he championed to get elected, the cornerstone of Labor to build a society for the many not the few, again trilatrilists believe the crisis of democracy is coming , the fact that the people have too much democracy.
Lively discussion this morning at the Trilateral Commission. Different views is an understatement – different views for Britain!https://t.co/4kVl9HIDbv– Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer)November 4, 2017See AlsoSeizure of oligarch's yachts pays off JP Morgan and raises eyebrowsThe exposed oligarchy | Council of European CanadiansA list: my promises to readers, Klopp, LFC, for the remainder of 2022/23 and through to 2023/24
While we have Sir Keir Starmer as a member of the Trilateral Commission and an agent of the oligarchy, as leader of the Labor Party he will have the power and support to get us down that road to servitude in the shortest possible time while he is in the party. at all times he has believers rooting for our progress to the point of losing all the rights we won in our millenary struggle together from the Magna Carta to the right to vote. Of course we will do all this in the name of economic progress and most will force us to do this just to pay our energy bills...
You might see Keir Starmer's Trilateral Commission members as the embodiment of globalists who have little need for national allegiance and see national borders as obstacles. This is by no means internationalism, this is globalization. People must be managed, not governed or represented.
We understand that elites who push their own political agenda have little need for national loyalty and see national borders as obstacles, have no affiliation or attachment.
The only useful role they see for national governments is to facilitate the global operations of the oligarchy. This anti-democratic elitist position, promoted by the political agents of the oligarchy, is exactly what Keir Starmer, a member of the Trilateral Commission, defends.
The objective of the national government is no longer to represent the people, but to promote the market and the globalist agenda.
This is an attack on the working class, a road to serfdom
The Davos mob, led by the World Economic Forum, promotes crony capitalism, corporate monopolies and free market fundamentalism. Corporations like to collaborate with government institutions and enrich themselves through mandates, regulations and subsidies that primarily benefit elites. This is just one form of corporate welfare.
They see the national government as the only useful function to facilitate the global operations of the elite. This agenda is an anti-democratic elitist position promoted by the political agents of the oligarchy. The main objective of the World Economic Forum is to act as a forum to crush the oligarchic mafiacracy of globalization.
Under the guise of free trade, countries are expected to accept imports of foreign goods and services into their home markets, regardless of the harm done to local producers. Although the World Trade Organization binds countries to free trade rules, it does not address subsidies, tariffs and non-tariff barriers to trade. This creates an uneven playing field, especially for developing countries and small businesses, as multinationals find ways to maximize their profits by taking advantage of the situation.
This "race to the bottom" is a mechanism that concentrates capital in a few hands, forcing individuals and companies to compete in a precarious environment. Vulnerable populations, including the working class, struggle with diminished rights and lack of access to resources. And if they can't handle that, they can no longer contribute to the market and instead become dependent on governments. In essence, this is an attack on the working class that leads down a path to serfdom.
This is an attack on the working class that is destroying good paying jobs and creating a downward spiral of poverty, inequality and insecurity that will eventually lead to serfdom.
The Labor Party is in the grip of the iron law of the oligarchy.
The Crisis of Democracy: Sir Keir Starmer and the Trilateral Commission
Sir Keir Starmer: The Trilateral Commission and Jeffrey Epstein
Who is "Mandelson" and how are they all connected?
Why are Labor Party leaders members of the same anti-democratic elite organization to which child molester Jeffrey Epstein belonged?
Heartlands job support
PLEASE HELP US KEEP AD FREE
HELP US GROW.
This is a "pay how you feel" site web.
Hello! Thanks for showing up. If you've enjoyed reading my blog so far, I would be very grateful if you could consider making a small donation. My blog is completely independent and does not receive any subsidies from the state, companies or institutions. Instead, it only relies on the support of readers like you.
While not everyone agrees with every article I publish, I pride myself on providing a unique perspective, insider information, and a platform for discussion. However, I simply cannot do this without your help.
So if you can give me a few pounds, dollars or euros I would be very grateful for your support. Your donations help me keep my blog up and running and ad-free, which means you can enjoy an uninterrupted reading experience.
Thanks again for your support. I really couldn't do this without you!